Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Is Translations about Language or Politics? Essay -- English Literatur

Is Translations about vocabulary or administration?Friel famously said of Translations, it is about row and providedlanguage. However, the governmental statement which Friel denies neednot be active, but passive, as seeking an understanding of thesituation must go steady administration, however Friel actively avoidspolitical comment peradventure due to the volatile situation in the 1980swhen the command was first put on.D.H. Lawrence famously said, Never swan the teller, trust the taleand with that in mind, I wish to explore the reasons wherefore audiences andreaders may perceive translations as a political hoyden.The action of the play over three acts shows the profoundly disturbinginfluence of the English control over the Baile Beag community andits life. Lenin once said, politics is who whom considering who actsand who is acted upon. Exploring politics from this point of view, wholenessis easily able to perceive the numerous political aspects of the play.One such(pr enominal) clearly political aspect of the play is the colonial forcearriving from England. A motility of armies from one country toanother, is a clearly political act, a gesture, to indicate apresence as was Doaltys movement of the Theodolyte.On the other authorize, if the play is about language (as Friel says) thenperhaps it is about language on two levels. On the one hand itconsiders language on an intertheme level (for example, the Irishand English languages) whilst on the other it considers language on aninterpersonal level, the way perhaps we stand for between privaciesor our choice of individual words in our speech. in that location are numerous ways in which one may consider the play to be aboutnational language. Many would consider language as ... ...haracters acting as a mouthpiece forFriels political points of view, and because of this, I believeFriels play must concern politics to some degree.In conclusion I believe Friel is telling a half-truth, when he saysthe play is about language and only language. This is true to that extentas the only issue the play is directly and aggressively considering isthe splendour of language. However, I believe Friel knew all to wellthat anyone watching of reading the play would have to considerpolitics, at least on a brotherly level, in order to fully understand theimportance of the social and national issues in the play. Therefore,Friels play is neither a play simply about language (as he asserts)or solely about politics the two are inextricably linked leaving uswith a socio-political play which emphasizes the importance oflanguage as a political tool.

No comments:

Post a Comment