Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

Kathy Dai M. Galvin AP USH Period 1 capital of Mississippiian Democracy DBQ The capital of Mississippiian democracy of the 1820s-1830s is often associated with an expansion of the political lick, sparing opportunities, and social equality available to the common man, a concept of the stack which President Andrew capital of Mississippi and his spic-and-spanly founded Democratic political society came to represent. The new brass section certainly saw gains for the majority namely, public company in authorities increased to unprecedented levels, and several economic decisions were make to favor the populate over monopolies.Beginning with their exaggerated portrayal of the corrupt 1824 choice however, the Jacksonian democrats as well left a legacy of substantial miscalculations in policies and acts of hypocrisy that conflicted with their claimed intents to fight and protect popular democracy. In particular, the dangerous implications of various political and economic polici es, along with the deliberate disregard of social inequality, are aspects of the Jacksonian jump on that most clear demonstrate discrepancies between Jacksonian ideals and realities.The political theater of operations saw the first advances accredited to the Jacksonian democracy in the forms of lengthy ballot and increased government participation, moreover it also involved many an(prenominal) questionable national acts that conflicted with the vision of political democracy. With Andrew Jacksons alternative in 1828 introducing the first president from West of the Appalachians, the common men that Jackson championed naturally arose to the political st shape up as well.States all across the state of matter adopted universal suffrage for white males on their own in the 1820s, but Jackson indeed bolstered the democratic trend through influence in newspapers, popular bell ringing, and even a huge inauguration party at the White House open to the masses. In terms of campaigning however, the election of 1828 was the first in which the political parties directly attacked each a nonher(prenominal)s candidates through the press.The increase in voter participation direct to a negative pattern of smear campaigning that aimed more to arguing the masses than convey the truth that a healthy democracy needs. Furthermore, Jacksons presidency was characterized by use of the spoils system and the systematic revolution of officeholders. These stipulated that federal jobs were strictly given to loyal Democrats and that federal offices could be held for still one term. While these practices were meant to emphasize equal political opportunities and build party loyalty, they inherently promoted government corruption.In fact, the power that Jackson wielded by trading federal positions for party loyalty both overextended his administrator power and practiced the same(p) corrupt bargaining of office that the Democrats accused John Quincy Adams of in the election of 1824. Thus, the Jacksonian democrats dealt clear detriments and hypocrisies to the system of popular democracy that they so powerfully advocated, despite their encouragement of universal white male suffrage and participation in office.Similarly, the Jacksonian age affected the economy both in accordance with the Jacksonian ideal of equal economic opportunity and against it an executive branch act and a judicial branch decision were made with the intent of favoring the people, but substantial opposition highlighted the negative side personal effects that undermined the Jacksonian goal. President Jackson represented the executive branch with his filmy move of vetoing a bill which proposed a re demanding of the Second Bank of the unite States.As conveyed by Jacksons dramatic veto message on July 10, 1832 the democrats maintained that the national rims monopoly on trade catered besides frequently to foreign and wealthy stockowners, thus posing a flagellum to the ideal of equal economic opportunity that they claimed to protect (B). The Jacksonians stuck with their vision of themselves in this sense, but opposing re live up tos to the veto pointed out that the attack on the bank was unnecessary and dangerous.Daniel Websters reply to the veto correctly asserted that by raising the alarm about an encroachment of economic freedoms, the Democrats were really ravishing the stableness of the economy needlessly (C). Websters analysis was proven accurate by the Panic of 1837, during which a bubble of inflation caused by the end of the national bank was abruptly burst, and several years of depression followed. The recession and unemployment caused indirectly by Jacksons cancelation of the national bank did more harm to public economic opportunities than good, despite the Jacksonians passionate belief in the curse that the Bank posed.Also in 1837 however, Chief Justice Roger Taneys Supreme woo decision of Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge was a decisive supremacy for the Jacksonian ideal of equal economic opportunity. Taney interpreted a 1785 charter for a bridge on the Charles River loosely so that a new bridge could be erected across the same river, thus dispelling a monopoly and financially benefitting the people (H).The Jacksonians evidently believed in their roles as the protectors of economic equality, but the results of the changes their governing made were again varied in agreement with their ideals. Finally, the Jacksonians most clearly drifted from their claimed ideals in the social sphere, as they actively neglected to guard the person liberties of minority groups and women. The Jacksonians rosy call for extended suffrage sole(prenominal) applied to white males, and the issue of slavery was deliberately avoided to retain unwanted conflicts between the states.In fact, the Jacksonian administration even put in place a gag rule in 1836 that allowed Congressmen to file apart abolition petitions without discussion because the Acts and Resolutions of South Carolina threatened independent state action if SC did not receive national and sectional support in controlling its slaves (F). The slaves quickly lost any support from the proclaimed Jacksonian ideal of several(prenominal) indecency when pitted against the preservation of the Union.Likewise, the administration did not hesitate to pass the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which revealed that grandiose Jacksonian ideals yielded to the American desire for new land as well. The Act oblige thousands of Native Americans to resettle in the West, with no regard for their personal liberties either. scour President Jackson outright denied to protect the ideal when he refused to execute the Supreme Courts decision on Worcester v. Georgia in 1832 John Marshall had ruled that the Cherokee had a right to their land, but Jackson would not stop the army from pushing the Cherokee out of Georgia regardless.The only evidence of any agreement with the Jacksonians vision of guard ing liberties is a romanticized painting of the Cherokee migration. The assorted Cherokees appear comfortable, unified, and still dignified, implying that the painter must have either imagined this as the reality of the situation or painted an ideal version of the stab (G). The painting actually contrasts sharply with the chaos and tragedy of the Cherokees trail of tears, but it is important that the Jacksonian intent is present. Although the mixtures of realized and neglected Jacksonian ideals in the political and economic ields were more even, the Jacksonians goal to preserve individual liberty was not entirely lost in the social issues of the age. In conclusion, the Jacksonian democrats certainly believed in their roles as guardians of political democracy, equality of economic opportunity, and individual liberty, but their intentions were often misguided or secondary in the example of greater challenges. The few clear strides made by the Jacksonian age were interspersed with i nstances of failure in realizing its democratic ideals, particularly in the social sphere.