The Politics of Humor :: essays research papers fc

     THE POLITICS OF COMEDY     Is this thing on?     In efforts to crusade voter education, laughter is perhaps the best strategery.     Comedy and tragedy promote one in the same, as the saying goes. The variability of the twosome, however, substantiates kind of inconsistently in politics, an arena overflowing with participants who take themselves too seriously. And where a potential drop candidate attempts to utilize comic relief, one often discovers the result to be rather tragic.     In lieu of the consequences politicians may endure with the mere voice of a poor joke, most tend to stray from the possibility of accept the Press turned japery hour. Especially when their reputations are at office politicians are well aware, according to Mark Katz, humorist and speechwriter for Bill Clinton, that a good joke will last about a calendar week, whereas a bad joke will be reprint ed in you obituary.      mayhap responsibility lies within the confines of a narrow-minded media, exhibited as a threat to be avoided rather than a tool to be implemented. however certainly with just cause the news media are poorly suited to their role as the principal intermediary between candidates and voters, rooted in the conception of politics as game and a business rather than a struggle over national policy.      The aforementioned incidents occur frequently, except not absolutely, should candidates appropriately utilize humor. The war on terror provides inevitable roadblocks on an already-tumultuous campaign trail, and even primitive technology such as television suffices in establishing the general 9/11 fear humor. The presumption of a candidates entrepreneurial priorities over his common relationship undermines the use of humor as the candidates last-ditch weapon.      The primarily noticeable aspect of pol itical campaign humor pertains to its absence. undoubtedly humor is used more sparingly than songs in political commercials the trade good appears even more so in the early campaign efforts of the mid-nineteenth blow than recent endeavors. Humors effectiveness originates from its multilevel success in the campaigning process. Involuntarily proliferated by an ever-expanding press, the ideal candidate would employ comedy because of its effervescent facility of concurrent humanization and advertisement. Moreover humorous politicians sound out an equally comical and less aggressive response within the enjoyment realm, successfully intertwining the sphere of pop culture with the relatively unscathed district of political science. The general consensus shaming the benefits of humor relates to its malleability it can be apply to attack the opposition, or it can serve to enhance a campaign.       enchantment it can be argued that humor refers to a conscious camp aign tactic on the part of its source, as a tool it only succeeds with regard to the respective candidate.